Nilai Kemanusiaan dalam Foto Jurnalistik Tentang Erupsi Gunung Agung, Bali, di Kompas.Com

  • Erisa Febriani 
    IISIP Jakarta
    Indonesia
  • Muharnetti Syas
    IISIP
    Indonesia

Abstract

This study examines the human values contained in photojournalism on the eruption of Mount Agung, Bali, at Kompas.com The research paradigm used is constructivist, qualitative methodology, and the semiotic analysis method of Roland Barthes’s research model. The results of the study show a photo of the eruption of Mount Agung presented as an illustration of a news text which displays the reality as it is without the effects of manipulation. The meaning of denotation shows the events of monitoring activities, evacuation of affected local residents to temporary shelters, the situation at the said shelters, assistance to refugees, presidential visits to affected sites, and community rituals. The meaning of the connotation that is constructed is the personal human dimension in the form of an expression of concern, anxiety; social dimension in the form of caring and equality, and cultural dimension in the form of surrender and spiritual beliefs.
Keywords
  • Mount Agung eruption, human values, journalistic photos, Kompas.com.
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Febriani, E., & Syas, M. (2020). Nilai Kemanusiaan dalam Foto Jurnalistik Tentang Erupsi Gunung Agung, Bali, di Kompas.Com. Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.36451/jisip.v17i1.23
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Agung, Komang Kayun, Benarkah Gunung Agung
  2. di Bali Itu Mistis? Ini Kisah Nyatanya, Pos
  3. Kupang, Jumat, 29 Juni 2018:11:32
  4. Ali, Zarqa S.(2013). Media Myths and
  5. Realities in Natural Disaster. European
  6. Journal of Business and Social
  7. Sciences,Vol.2,No. 1, pp 125-133,
  8. Barthes, Roland.(1977). Image Music Text.
  9. Essays selected and translated by Stephen
  10. Heath. London: Fontana Press
  11. Berger, Arthur Asa. (2015). Pengantar Semiotika:
  12. Tanda-Tanda dalam Kebudayaan
  13. Kontemporer. Jogja: Buku Beta
  14. Combs, A. W., Richards, A. C., & Richards,
  15. F. (1976). Perceptual psychology: A
  16. humanistic approach to the study of
  17. persons. University Press of America
  18. Creswell, John W. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif &
  19. Desain Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  20. Eriyanto. (2008). Analisis Wacana Pengantar
  21. Analisis Teks Media. Jakarta: LkiS
  22. Gani, Rita & Rizki Ratri. (2013). Jurnalistik Foto
  23. Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Simbiosa
  24. Rekatama Media
  25. Herimanto & Winarno. (2017). Ilmu Sosial dan
  26. Budaya Dasar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
  27. Houston, J. Brian. Pfefferbaum, Betty and
  28. Rosenholtz, Cathy Ellen. 2012. Disaster
  29. News: Framing and Frame Changing
  30. in Coverage of Major U.S. Natural
  31. Disasters, 2000-2010. Journalism & Mass
  32. Communication Quarterly 89: 606 DOI:
  33. 1177/1077699012456022. London:
  34. Sagepub
  35. Joye, STIJN. (2011). The hierarchy of global
  36. suffering. Journal of International
  37. Communication. 15:2, 45-61, DOI:
  38. 1080/13216597.2009.9674750.
  39. London: Routledge
  40. Littlefield, Robert S. & Quenette, M. (2007).
  41. Crisis Leadership and Hurricane Katrina:
  42. The Portrayal of Authority by the Media
  43. in Natural Disasters. Journal of Applied
  44. JURNAL ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Vol 17 No. 1 Thn. 2020 11
  45. Communication Research Vol. 35, No. 1,
  46. February 2007, pp. 26-47
  47. Littlejohn, Stephen W & Karen A. Foss. (2009).
  48. Teori Komunikasi. Jakarta: Salemba
  49. Humanika
  50. Moleong, Lexy J.(2009). Metodologi Penelitian
  51. Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
  52. Monteiro, Charles. (2016). History and photo
  53. journalism: reflection on the concept and
  54. research in the area. Traslated by Evando
  55. Lisboa Freire, Revista Tempo e Argemento,
  56. Florianopolis, V.8, n17, 489-514.Jan./Apr.
  57. Safire,William.(1996). Standing History Still: A
  58. Prolegomenon in Galassi, Peter. Kismaric,
  59. Susan (ed). Picture of Time: a century of
  60. phothography from the New York times.
  61. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
  62. Salkowe, Richar. Tobin, Graham A & Bird,
  63. S. Elizabeth. Calamty, Catastrophene
  64. and Horor Representation of Nanural
  65. Disaster 1885-2005. Papers of the Applied
  66. Geography Conferences (2006) 29: 196-
  67. Sobur, Alex. (2016). Semiotika Komunikasi.
  68. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
  69. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif,
  70. Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
  71. Sujarwa. (2010). Ilmu Sosial dan Budaya Dasar.
  72. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  73. Sunardi, S.T. (2013). Semiotika Negativa.
  74. Yogyakarta: Kanal
  75. Tamburaka. (2012). Agenda Setting Media Massa.
  76. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada
  77. Tierney, Kathleen. Bevc, Christine. Kuligowski,
  78. Erica. Metaphors Matter 2006. Disaster
  79. Myths, Media Frames, and Their
  80. Consequences in Hurricane Katrina.
  81. The Annals of the American Academy of
  82. Political and Social Science , Vol. 604,
  83. UK. Sage Publications, Inc.
  84. Tinarbuko, Sumbo. (2008). Semiotika
  85. Komunikasi Visual. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra
  86. Wijaya, Taufan. (2014). Foto Jurnalistik. Jakarta:
  87. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  88. Yin, Liangen & Wang, Haiyan, 2010. Peoplecentred myth: Representation of the
  89. Wenchuan earthquake in China Daily,
  90. Discourse & Communication 4(4) 383–)
  91. DOI: 10.1177/1750481310381581.
  92. UK: Sagepub
Check for updates

Issue

Downloads

pdf

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 126 times
pdf
: 137 times