Retorika Populisme Dalam Kontestasi Politik Di Indonesia: Studi Fenomenologi pada Generasi Milenial terhadap Retorika Post-Truth Calon Presiden pada Pemilihan Presiden 2019

Studi Fenomenologi pada Generasi Milenial terhadap Retorika Post-Truth Calon Presiden pada Pemilihan Presiden 2019

  • Daniel Deha 
    IISIP Jakarta
    Indonesia

Abstract

The 2019 Presidential Election is a practical implication of the post-truth populist trends in Indonesia. This study aims to explore the Millennials’ perception on the post-truth rhetorics of presidential candidates in the 2019 Presidential Election. The theory used in this study is the theory of post-truth rhetorics, grounded on phenomenology and the descriptive-qualitative approach. The article finds that there was a rejection of Prabowo’s post-truth populist rhetorics because they were incompatible with Indonesia’s political, social and cultural characters. In the Indonesian political context, rhetorical ability is not a benchmark. The most important thing is the credibility, integrity, and track record of political actors. It was also found that the media tends to eschew Prabowo’s post-truth populist messages. But in principle, there is almost no stark difference among both candidates’ populist rethorics in the election. Both carry identity politics and are affiliated with elites and oligarchs, so the populist politics are contradictory to the candidates.
Keywords
  • Joko Widodo; Millennials;Phenomenology; Populism; Post-Truth Rethorics; Prabowo Subianto
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Deha, D. (2021). Retorika Populisme Dalam Kontestasi Politik Di Indonesia: Studi Fenomenologi pada Generasi Milenial terhadap Retorika Post-Truth Calon Presiden pada Pemilihan Presiden 2019. Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36451/jisip.v18i1.45
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Adib, Mohammad. (2011). Filsafat Ilmu: Ontologi, Epistemologi, Aksiologi, dan Logika Ilmu Pengetahuan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  2. Ariotedjo, Dito. (2017). “Milenial Kota versus Milenial Desa.” Diakses dari https://geotimes. co.id/kolom/sosial/milenial-kota-versus- milenial-desa/ pada 29 Juli 2020.
  3. Aspinall, Edward. (2015). “Oligarchic Populism: Prabowo Subianto’s Challenge to Indonesian Democracy”. Southeast Asia Program Publications at Cornell University. Indonesia, No. 99 (April 2015), 1-28.
  4. Beattie, Darren J. (2019) “When Populism Fails”. Diakses dari https://spectator.us/when- populism-fails/, pada 1 September 2019.
  5. Block, D. (2019). Post Truth and Political Discourse. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Block, Elena and Negrine, Ralph. (2017). “The Populist Communication Style: Toward a Critical Framework”. International Journal
  6. of Communication 11.
  7. Brocher, Thomas M. (2005). “Empirical Relations between Elastic Wavespeeds and Density in the Earth’s Crust.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
  8. Creswell, John W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  9. De Vreese, C. H., et.al (2018). “Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 1, 23(4), 423-438.
  10. Dimock, Michael. (2019). “Defining generations: Where Millennials End and Generation Z Begins”. Diakses dari https://www. pewresearch.org/fact-tank/where-millennials- end-and-generation-z-begins/, 11 September
  11. Engesser, Sven, et al. (2017). “Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented
  12. Ideology.” Information, Communication & Society Journal, 20(8): 1109-1126.
  13. Gazali, Effendi. (Juli 2018). “Degrading Message and Hate Speech are Now Obligatory in Elections? A Qualitative Research on “post- truth” Populism in Sumatera Utara’s Local Election”. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, Vol. VII, Issue 2.
  14. Gidron, N., & Bonikowski, B. (2013). “Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Weatherhead Working Paper Series, No.13: 0–38.
  15. Glen, Lewis and Slade, Christina. (1994). Critical Communication. Sydney: Pretince Hall Australia.
  16. Golose, P. R. (2019). “Strategi Penanganan Firehouse of Falsehood pada Era ‘Post-Truth’. Kajian dalam Rangka Menyukseskan Pemilu 2019.” Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 13(No.1), 6–15.
  17. Hadiz, Vedi R. (2017). “Populisme Baru dan Masa Depan Demokrasi Indonesia”. Jurnal Prisma, Vol. 36, No.1.
  18. Harsin, Jayson. (2018). “Post-Truth” Populism: The French Anti-Gender Theory Movement and Cross-Cultural Similarities.” Oxford University Press on behalf of International Communication Association: Communication Culture & Critique, No.11: 35–52.
  19. Hastuti, Puji. (27 Mei 2019). “Liputan Kegiatan Diskusi Bulanan: Kota Global dan Jabodetabek ‘World City Formation and The Jakarta Metropolitan”. Diakses dari https:// kependudukan.lipi.go.id/id/berita/seputar- kegiatan-ppk/652-liputan-kegiatan-diskusi- bulanan-kota-global-dan-jabodetabek-world- city-formation-and-the-jakarta-metropolitan, 30 Juli 2020.
  20. Jagers, Jan and Walgrave, Stefaan. (September 2005). “Populism as Political Communication Style. An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium.” European Journal of Political Science.
  21. Jatmiko, Mochamad Iqbal. (Juni 2019). “Post Truth, Media Sosial, Dan Misinformasi: Pergolakan Wacana Politik Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia Tahun 2019”. Jurnal Tabligh, Vol.20 No.1.
  22. Kuswarno, Engkus. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi. Fenomenologi, Konsepsi, Pedoman dan Contoh Penelti. Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.
  23. Larson, D.W. (1983). “The Pattern of Production Withinindividual Umbilicaria Lichen Thalli.”
  24. New Phytol (1983) 94, 409-419.
  25. Littlejohn, Stephen W. (1996). Theories of Human Communication. Belmont: Thomson Learning Academic Resource Center.
  26. Littlejohn, Stephen, et.al. (2017). Theories of Human Communication. 11th Edition. Illinois: Wavwland Press, Inc.
  27. Lucas, Richard E. (2007). Personality and the Pursuit of Happiness. London: Social and Personality Psychology Compass.
  28. McComiskey, Bruce. (2017). “Post-Truth” Rhetoric and Composition. Colorado: Utah State University Press.
  29. McIntyre, Lee C. (2018). Post-Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  30. Moleong, J.J. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  31. Montgomery, Martin. (Juni 2017). “Post-Truth” Politics? Authenticity, Populism and the Electoral Discourses of Donald Trump”. Journal of Language and Politics: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  32. Mudde, C. (2004). “The Populist Zeitgeist”. Journal of Government and Opposition, Vol.39, Issue 4.
  33. Muhtadi, Burhanuddin. (2019). Populisme Politik Identitas dan Dinamina Elektoral. Mengurai Jalan Panjang Demokrasi Prosedural. Malang: Intrans Publishing.
  34. Nadzir, Ibnu. (2019). “Prabowo dan Bangkitnya Populisme Sayap Kanan di Indonesia”. Diakses dari https://tirto.id/prabowo-dan- bangkitnya-populisme-sayap-kanan-di- indonesia? pada 19 September 2019.
  35. Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Edisi 11. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
  36. Nimmo, Dan. (2011). Komunikasi Politik. Komunikator, Pesan, dan Media. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  37. Paskarina, Caroline. (2017). “Narasi Identitas Populis dalam Demokrasi Elektoral”. Jurnal Bawaslu, Vol.3, No.2: 285-297.
  38. Pyöriä, Pasi, et.al. (January-March 2017). “The Millennial Generation: A New Breed of Labour?” SAGE Open: 1-14.
  39. Qodari, M. (2018). “Pengamat Indo Barometer: Prabowo sedang tiru jurus Donald Trump saat Pemilu AS 2016.” Diakses dari https:// www.merdeka.com/politik/pengamat-indo- barometer-prabowo-sedang-tiru-jurus- donald-trump-saat-pemilu-as-2016.html.
  40. Ritonga, A. D. & Adela, F. P. (2019). “Mencermati Populisme Prabowo sebagai Bentuk Gaya Diskursif Saat Kampanye Politik pada Pemilihan Presiden 2019”. Politeia: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 12 (1), 1-13.
  41. Sutejo, Indra Lesmana dan Farid Rusdi. (2018). “Analisis Framing Media Online Tentang Pemberitaan Pidato Prabowo ‘Tampang Boyolali’.” Koneksi, Vol. 2, No. 2: 605-611.
  42. Syafi’ie, I. (1988). Retorika dalam Menulis. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  43. Syuhada, Kharisma Dhimas. (April 2017). “Etika Media di Era “Post-Truth” (Tinjauan Buku). Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, Vol. V, No.1.
  44. Winters, Jeffrey A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Check for updates

Issue

Downloads

pdf

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 518 times
pdf
: 608 times