Konstelasi Golkar dan Elit dalam Politik Indonesia Pasca Pemerintahan Orde Baru

Abstract

This article discusses the constellation of Golkar and its elites after the fall of the New Order administration. The conceptual and theoretical framework used includes party functions and the circulation of political elites. This article uses descriptive qualitative research methods based on primary data sourced from direct interviews with Golkar officials and on secondary data from various documents and publications of research. The results of the study show that at the beginning after the end of the New Order administration, the political elites of Golkar developed a constellation of elites that adopted a democratic and bottom-up and collegial culture, leaving behind the authoritarian practices. However, before and after the 2009 presidential election, with the entry of several businessmen into Golkar, the Golkar political elites carried out transactional practices in building power bases both at the party and government levels. This condition interferes with the recruitment processes and puts Golkar in an awkward position when not in power
Keywords
  • : Golkar; Political Elite; Power, Presidential Election; Transactional
How to Cite
Sadariah Saragih, & Lelita Yunia. (2023). Konstelasi Golkar dan Elit dalam Politik Indonesia Pasca Pemerintahan Orde Baru. Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 18(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.36451/jisip.v18i1.47
References
  1. Budiarjo, Miriam. (2008). Dasar-dasar Ilmu
  2. Politik, Gramedia, Jakarta
  3. Danial, Ahmad.(2018). Wajah Buram Partai
  4. Politik. Jurnal (buletin) Hukum dan Keadilan
  5. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.Volume 2 nomor
  6. d Tahun 2018
  7. Reeve, David. (2013). Golkar Sejarah yang
  8. Hilang. Akar Pemikiran dan Dinamika.
  9. Depok: Komunitas Bambu
  10. Ghafur, Jamaludin dan al Arif. (2017). Suksesi
  11. Pimpinan dalam Partai Politik: Studi atas Partai
  12. Golkar dan Partai Persatuan Pembangunan,
  13. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum No. 4 Vol. 24
  14. Oktober 2017
  15. Hafid, Meutya Viada. ( 2018). Konsensus Politik
  16. Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Partai Golkar
  17. Tahun 2014-2016. Jurnal Penelitian POLITIK,
  18. vol 15 no. 1 (2018)
  19. Nurjaman, Asep.(2018). Masa Depan
  20. Faksionalisme Politik Golkar Pasca Orde
  21. Baru, Jurnal Sospol, Vol 4 No 2 Juli –
  22. Desember 2018
  23. Marham, Idrus. (2016). Magnet Politik Partai
  24. Golkar. Bekasi : Penjuru Ilmu Sejatii
  25. Ridha T.R,Muhammad. (2016). Dilema
  26. Pelembagaan Partai Golongan Karya (Golkar)
  27. Di Tingkat Lokal: Fenomena Politik Klan ,
  28. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan CosmoGov, Vol. 2
  29. No. 1, April 2016
  30. Rodee, dkk. 1993. Pengantar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta:
  31. Rajawali
  32. MacAndrews, Colin dan Mas’oed, Mohtar. (2018).
  33. Perbandingan Sistem Politik. Yogyakarta:
  34. Gajah Mada University Press
  35. Sukmadinata.(2006). Metode Penelitian
  36. Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosdakarya
  37. Varma, SP. (2003). Teori Politik Modern. Jakarta:
  38. PT Raja Grafindo
  39. Tanjung, Akbar. (2008). The Golkar Way (Survival
  40. Partai Golkar Di Tengah Turbulensi
  41. Politik Era Transisi). Jakarta: Gramedia.
  42. Jawapos (b). (2016). Golkar Blunder di Langkah
  43. Pertama” selasa 31 Mei 2016
  44. Jawapos (a). (2016 ).Partai Golkar Resmi Keluar
  45. dari KMP, Selasa 17 Mei 2016
  46. Viva.co.id. (2016). Perolehan Suara Partai
  47. Golkar di Tiga Pemilu, http://politik.news.
  48. viva.co.id/news/read/496072-perolehansuara-partai-golkar-di-tiga-pemilu
  49. Reiter, Howard L.(2006). The Study of Political
  50. Parties, 1906–2005: The View from the
  51. Journals, American Political Science Review,
  52. Vol. 100, No. 4 November 2006,
  53. Ignazi, Piero.(1996). The crisis of parties and the
  54. rise of new political parties, Party Politics vol
  55. No.4 pp.549-566
  56. Ignazi, Piero, (2014). Power and the (il)legitimacy
  57. of political parties: An unavoidable paradox of
  58. contemporary democracy. Party Politics , Vol.
  59. (2) 160–169 ª The Author(s) 2014 Reprints
  60. and Sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.
  61. nav DOI: 10.1177/1354068813519970 ppq.
  62. sagepub.com