The Hegemonic Identity and State Interests in the United States’ TikTok Ban Policy (2020)

Abstract

This article examines the United States’ TikTok ban policy in 2020 by analyzing the relationship between hegemonic identity, state interests, and foreign policy actions. Drawing upon a constructivist perspective, the study argues that the policy should not be understood solely as a technocratic response to cybersecurity concerns, but rather as part of a broader effort to preserve the United States’ dominant position within the global technological order. The United States’ identity as the hegemonic power shaped the construction of strategic interests related to cybersecurity, digital sovereignty, and platform competition, which were subsequently translated into the restrictive policy measures targeting TikTok as the Chinese-owned platform. Using a qualitative case study approach, this article analyzes policy documents, official government statements, and relevant academic literature concerning digital politics and US–China technological rivalry. The findings demonstrate that the TikTok ban reflected broader geopolitical anxieties regarding China’s technological rise and the shifting balance of power within the global digital economy. This article contributes to International Relations scholarship by highlighting the role of identity in shaping foreign policy behavior in the context of digital capitalism and technological competition.

Keywords
  • The United States
  • Identity
  • Constructivism
  • TikTok
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Saputra, O. B., & Hlaing, H. M. T. (2026). The Hegemonic Identity and State Interests in the United States’ TikTok Ban Policy (2020). Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 23(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.36451/jisip.v23i1.501
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Allyn, B. (2020, August 6). Trump Signs Executive Order That Will Effectively Ban Use Of TikTok In the U.S. NPR. Retrieved September 6, 2024, from https://www.npr.org/2020/08/06/900019185/trump-signs-executive-order-that-will-effectively-ban-use-of-tiktok-in-the-u-s
  2. Annur, C. M. (2023, May 24). 10 Negara dengan Jumlah Pengguna TikTok Terbanyak di Dunia (April 2023). Databoks, Katadata. Retrieved August 21, 2024, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/05/24/pengguna-tiktok-di-indonesia-terbanyak-kedua-di-dunia-per-april-2023-nyaris-salip-as
  3. Bakry, U. S. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hubungan Internasional. Pustaka Pelajar.
  4. Cavelty, M. D., & Wenger, A. (2020). Cyber security meets security politics: Complex technology, fragmented politics, and networked science. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1678855
  5. Chen, A. W., Chen, J., & Dondeti, V. R. (2019, July 26). The US-China trade war: Dominance of trade or technology? Applied Economics Letters, 27(11), 904–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1646860
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  7. Deibert, R. J. (2015). Authoritarianism goes global: Cyberspace under siege. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0051
  8. Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in the United States of America. (2013, July 10). The Third China-U.S. Strategic Security Dialogue Held in Washington, D.C. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from http://us.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zmgxss/201307/t20130711_4368698.htm
  9. Hansen, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Digital disaster, cyber security and the Copenhagen School. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 1155–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00572.x
  10. Iasiello, E. (2016, January). China’s cyber initiatives counter international pressure. Journal of Strategic Security, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.10.1.1548
  11. Ichwan, R. P., & Nursita, R. D. (2023, June 16). Sekuritisasi TikTok di Amerika Serikat di masa pemerintahan Donald Trump pada tahun 2020. JISIERA, 6(1), 20–50. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8035794
  12. Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton University Press.
  13. Ilmie, M. I. (2020, September 17). Kesepakatan TikTok-Oracle tinggal persetujuan otoritas di China dan AS. Antara. Retrieved September 6, 2024, from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/1732690/kesepakatan-tiktok-oracle-tinggal-persetujuan-otoritas-di-china-dan-as
  14. Indrayani, I., & Maharani, T. (2022, August 28). The United State’s national security protection from cyber crime threats: A case study of TikTok banning submission by President Donald Trump in 2020. Journal of Social Political Sciences, 3(3), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.52166/jsps.v3i3.122
  15. Jinghua, L., & Kalwani, G. (2024, September 4). Navigating the US-China competition in cyberspace. Transatlantic Policy Quarterly, 19(2), 135–144. http://turkishpolicy.com/files/articlepdf/navigating-the-us-china-competition-in-cyberspace_en_7677.pdf
  16. Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61–69. https://issues.org/rise-platform-economy-big-datawork/
  17. Lam, L., & Chen, S. (2013, June 22). EXCLUSIVE: US spies on Chinese mobile phone companies, steals SMS data: Edward Snowden. South China Morning Post. Retrieved September 4, 2024, from https://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1266821/us-hacks-chinese-mobile-phone-companies-steals-sms-data-edward-snowden
  18. Lee, K.-F. (2017, December). China’s Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Understanding Beijing’s Structural Advantages [Report]. Eurasia Group. Retrieved August 19, 2024, from https://www.eurasiagroup.net/files/upload/China_Embraces_AI.pdf
  19. Li, W. (2025). The political economy of technological change and China’s path of innovation. Asian Review of Political Economy, 4(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44216-025-00053-9
  20. Loftus, S. (2020, August 7). Statement on the Administration’s Executive Order. TikTok Newsroom. Retrieved September 18, 2024, from https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/tiktok-responds
  21. Louie, C. (2017, September 8). U.S.-China Cybersecurity Cooperation. The Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies. https://jsis.washington.edu/news/u-s-china-cybersecurity-cooperation/
  22. Moffitt, B. (2020). Populism. Polity Press.
  23. Mudde, C. (2019). The Far Right Today. Polity Press.
  24. Muhamad, N. (2024, July 29). 10 Media Sosial dengan Jumlah Pengguna Terbanyak di Dunia (2023). Databoks. Retrieved August 23, 2024, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2024/07/29/10-media-sosial-dengan-jumlah-pengguna-terbanyak-di-dunia-2023
  25. Nasrullah, R. (2015). Media Sosial: Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, dan Sosioteknologi. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.
  26. Natalia, D. L. (2024, March 15). China: RUU soal TikTok di AS cermin persaingan tidak sehat. Antara. Retrieved September 13, 2024, from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4010676/china-ruu-soal-tiktok-di-as-cermin-persaingan-tidak-sehat
  27. Rosyidin, M. (2015). The Power of Ideas: Konstruktivisme dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional (1st ed.). Tiara Wacana.
  28. Saputra, O. B., & Larasati, R. A. (2023). The political influence of US and China vaccine competition in Southeast Asia on potential new security issues for ASEAN countries. Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 20(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.36451/jisip.v20i1.12
  29. Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Polity Press.
  30. Wendt, A. (2012). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183
Check for updates

Issue

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 67 times
PDF
: 33 times