Sirkuit Legitimasi dan Mutasi Diskursif dalam Wacana Swasembada Pangan: Analisis Wacana Kritis pada Tiga Media Daring Nasional (2024–2026)

Abstract

Artikel ini melaporkan hasil penelitian tentang sirkuit legitimasi politik pangan rezim populis Prabowo Subianto periode 2024–2026 yang mengklaim akselerasi swasembada kilat di tengah trauma kegagalan historis proyek agraria skala besar. Melalui paradigma kritis model sosiokognitif Teun A. van Dijk yang diintegrasikan dengan teori ekonomi politik pangan, penelitian kualitatif ini mengomparasi teks wacana induk negara dengan pemberitaan Republika. Co.id, Kompas.com, dan Detik.com. Keabsahan hasil penelitian ditunjukkan dengan menggunakan prinsip historical situatedness makroglobal, yaitu mencocokkan temuan penelitian dengan konteks historis yang berlaku sedangkan pada level teks dilakukan audit trail. Hasil penelitian membuktikan adanya penyederhanaan logika populis yang mereduksi ketahanan pangan menjadi swasembada beras statistikal. Hegemoni rezim mengalami pembelahan (fractured hegemony) akibat benturan material dengan dugaan anomali iklim ekstrem “El Nino Godzilla” dan geopolitik global. Implikasi teoretis riset ini melahirkan kebaruan konsep mengenai Mutasi Diskursif, yaitu kekuasaan populis sekuat apa pun pada akhirnya melunakkan janji hulu mereka demi tunduk pada batasan ekologis alam dan realitas ekonomi tingkat bawah.

Keywords
  • Analisis Wacana Kritis
  • Mutasi diskursif
  • Politik pangan
  • Sirkuit legitimasi
  • Swasembada pangan
Lisensing Information
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Mustaqim, A., Suryanjari, E., Yuliati, L. R., Suharini, M., & Putri, S. I. (2026). Sirkuit Legitimasi dan Mutasi Diskursif dalam Wacana Swasembada Pangan: Analisis Wacana Kritis pada Tiga Media Daring Nasional (2024–2026). Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 23(1), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.36451/jisip.v23i1.608
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Belton, B., Allison, E. H., & Huque, S. I. (2020). Rajat’s world: Narratives of food system transformation in Bangladesh. Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(7), 1362–1385. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1813919
  2. Borras Jr., S. M. (2020). Agrarian social movements: The alterations of politicizing food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(7), 1395–1421. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1803839
  3. BPS. (2024). Luas panen dan produksi padi di Indonesia 2023 (angka tetap). Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id
  4. Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  5. Canovan, M. (2005). The people. Polity Press.
  6. Castells, M. (2017). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
  7. Clapp, J., & Moseley, W. G. (2020). Food and agricultural statecraft in an era of globalization. World Development, 134, 105022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105022
  8. Davidson, J. S. (2018). Indonesia’s rice policy and the politics of food sovereignty. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(1), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1374320
  9. Fadhli, A., & Siregar, H. (2023). Tantangan struktural swasembada pangan di Indonesia: Analisis kritis kebijakan agrikultur. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik, 14(2), 145–160.
  10. Fuchs, C. (2021). Social media: A critical introduction (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  11. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Contradiction and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  12. Habermas, J. (2016). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Polity Press.
  13. Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage.
  14. Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. Oxford University Press.
  15. Hidayat, A. S. (2022). Evaluasi efisiensi mekanisasi pertanian dalam pencapaian swasembada pangan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 10(1), 88–102.
  16. INDEF. (2024). Tinjauan ekonomi: Tantangan pangan di era transisi kepemimpinan. Institute for Development of Economics and Finance.
  17. Johnson, R. (1986). What is cultural studies anyway? Social Text, 16, 38–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466285
  18. Kurnia, D., Santosa, I., & Wijaya, A. (2022). Kegagalan Food Estate dan dampaknya terhadap ketahanan ekologis: Sebuah tinjauan kritis. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 20(1), 45–58.
  19. Kurniawan, N. I., Wardhana, A., & Purnomo, E. P. (2023). Hegemony and land grabbing: A critical analysis of the food estate policy in Indonesia. Journal of Political Ecology, 30(1), 210–228.
  20. Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
  21. Li, T. M. (2014). Land’s end: Capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Duke University Press.
  22. Lounela, A. (2021). The state and the food frontier: Nationalizing food security and the politics of land in Indonesia. Human Ecology, 49(3), 321–333.
  23. McChesney, R. W. (2015). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. New York University Press.
  24. McMichael, P. (2016). Food regimes and agrarian questions. Fernwood Publishing.
  25. Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780190234874.001.0001
  26. Mudhoffir, A. M. (2021). Populism and the struggle over oligarchic power in contemporary Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 51(3), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2020.1764421
  27. Neilson, J., & Wright, J. (2023). The political economy of food sovereignty in Southeast Asia: Agribusiness, states, and peasants. Routledge.
  28. Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life: Ecology and the accumulation of capital. Verso Books.
  29. Pasaribu, S. M. (2023). Strategi pengendalian konversi lahan sawah untuk mendukung ketahanan pangan nasional. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 21(1), 15–32.
  30. Prabowo, S. (2024). Pidato pelantikan Presiden Republik Indonesia periode 2024–2029. Sekretariat Negara.
  31. Pratt, J. (2021). Gramsci and the politics of food: Hegemony, common sense, and the struggle for sustainability. Journal of Rural Studies, 82, 450–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.022
  32. Rusono, N., dkk. (2021). Analisis kebijakan subsidi pupuk dan dampaknya terhadap produksi padi. Bappenas Working Paper Series.
  33. Santosa, D. A. (2021). Politik pangan nasional: Antara utopia swasembada dan realitas impor. IPB Press.
  34. Sari, P. K., & Winarno, B. (2022). Ketahanan pangan dan stabilitas politik: Evaluasi kebijakan rezim pasca-reformasi. Jurnal Politik Indonesia, 8(2), 112–130.
  35. Scoones, I., Edelman, M., Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Wolford, W., & White, B. (2018). Emancipatory rural politics: Confronting authoritarian populism. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693
  36. Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Thompson, J., & Newell, P. (2022). The politics of green transformations. Routledge.
  37. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective. Routledge.
  38. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  39. Suryana, A. (2022). Menuju ketahanan pangan nasional berkelanjutan: Tantangan ekologis dan distribusi spasial. Pustaka Utama.
  40. Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 466–485). Wiley-Blackwell.
  41. Van Dijk, T. A. (2016). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316146934
  42. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Check for updates

Issue

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 99 times
PDF
: 7 times