Post Publication Discussion

Jurnal ISIP : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik is committed to promoting open, constructive, and responsible scholarly communication as part of its effort to maintain the integrity and advancement of science. Post-publication discussion provides a space for the academic community to provide feedback, scientific critique, or clarification on articles published in Jurnal ISIP : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. This policy is designed to ensure that every discussion is conducted professionally, ethically, and transparently, in alignment with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and JISIP's publication ethics provisions. Discussion communication can also be conducted via email.

Types of Post-Publication Discussion

  1. Letters to the Editor

Readers may submit written comments or responses to published articles. Letters must be relevant to the article's substance, supported by adequate scientific arguments or evidence, and written in a polite and constructive manner. Letters will be reviewed by the editorial board before a decision is made to publish them.

  1. Author Response

Authors of the original articles are given the opportunity to respond to the comments or criticisms presented. The author's response will be published alongside the reader's letter as part of an intact scholarly record.

  1. Commentary or Discussion Article

In certain cases, more in-depth discussions may be published in the form of commentary articles or short discussion articles that undergo a peer-review process, especially if the topic triggers significant scientific debate or requires further elaboration.