Politik Dan Tradisi: Politik Uang Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa

Abstract

The election of the village head is a democracy celebration for such communities as that in Kedungjati Village. The people of Kedungjati Village have strong ties among themselves so they know the prospective village head on a personal level. However cheating is still often encountered, one of whose elements is the practice of money politics. This study aims to explain the rational actions of the people of Kedungjati Village regarding the acceptance of money politics. The previous election of the candidate for Village Head of Kedungjati was won by the candidate with the least encounters of money politics. This study uses a qualitative approach with observations and interviews. The subjects of this research are the people of Kedungjati Village who accepted money politics when the election for the Village Head of Kedungjati was in progress. The results showed that the act of accepting bribes was based on a utilitarian mindset. People consider money politics as a tradition. The people of Kedungjati Village will come to the TPS with sangu money or money given by the candidates. Money politics is accepted because of the assumption that rejecting luck is not a good thing. Since the beginning, the community has known the motives and goals of the candidates. But on the other hand, society has its own criteria for candidates without coercion put in effect by money politics.
Keywords
  • Democracy, Elections; Money politics;Motives; Traditions
How to Cite
Magda Ilona Dwi Putri, Nahdia Arifani, Dela Ratnasari, Maurelia Vidiara Auliavia, Sinta Nuriyah, & Agus Mahfud Fauzi. (2023). Politik Dan Tradisi: Politik Uang Dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa. Jurnal ISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 17(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.36451/jisip.v17i2.41
References
  1. Afif, Y. (2015). Analisis Teori Tindakan Rasional Max Weber pada Fenomena Sunat Bagi Wanita di Daerah Indramayu Jawa Barat. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from blog.unnes.ac.id/yahya1/2015/11/17/ analisis-teori-tindakan-rasional-max-weber-pada- fenomena-sunat-bagi-wanita-di-daerah-indramayu- jawa-barat/
  2. Agustin, R. S. (2018). Rasionalitas Pemilih Bupati Tulungagung Pada Pilkada Tahun 2018. Jurnal Mahasiswa Unesa, 1–6.
  3. Agustin, S. (2019). Pemkab Bogor Bahas Sanksi Politik Uang di Pilkades. detikNews, pp. 1–2. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4759494/ pemkab-bogor-bahas-sanksi-politik-uang-di- pilkades?tag_from=news_cb_terbaru_list
  4. Amanu, M. (2015). Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa (Studi Kasus di Desa Jatirejo Kecamatan Banyakan Kabupaten Kediri).
  5. Ayuningtyas, R. (2019, April 16). Polri Tangani 22 Kasus Politik Uang Selama Masa Tenang, pp. 1–4. Retrieved from https://www.liputan6.com/pileg/ read/3944561/polri-tangani-22-kasus-politik-uang- selama-masa-tenang
  6. Fauzi, A. M. (2018). Politik Kebijakan Pemberantasan Korupsi. (F. S. Sadewo & R. H. Listyani, Eds.). Surabaya: UNESA UNIVERSITY PRESS.
  7. Fauzi, A., Sudrajat, A., Affandi, A., & Raditya, A. (2018). Maintaining Identity Political Culture In Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 953.
  8. Fitriyah. (2015). Cara Kerja Politik Uang (Studi Kasus Pilkada dan Pilkades di Kabupaten Pati), 6(2), 101– 111.
  9. Ismawan, I. (1999). Pengaruh Uang dalam Pemilu.
  10. Yogyakarta: Media Presindo.
  11. Liputan6.com. (2020). Bawaslu Ingatkan Waspada Politik Uang Jenis Baru di Pilkada 2020. Liputan6. com, pp. 6–7. Retrieved from https://www.liputan6. com/pilkada/read/4194337/bawaslu-ingatkan-
  12. waspada-politik-uang-jenis-baru-di-pilkada-2020 Miles, M. ., & A.M., H. (2009). Analisis Data Kualitatif
  13. Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru (I). Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
  14. Mugiono, W. (2015). Perilaku Politik Warga Timbulharjo Dalam Pemilihan Lurah Desa Tahun 2013.
  15. Muhlis, A., & Norkholis. (2016). Analisis Tindakan Sosial Max Weber dalam Tradisi Pembacaan kitab Mukhtashar Al-Bukhari. Jurnal Living Hadis, 1(2).
  16. Nadir. (2018). Membangun Pendidikan Politik Dalam Fatsun Demokrasi Pancasila Dan Deliberative, 3(1), 126–141. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.26740/ jsm.v3n1.p126-141
  17. Nuratika. (2015). Politik Uang Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Desa Ketapang Permai dan Desa Tanjung Kulim Kab Kepulauan Meranti tahun 2015, 4(2), 1–15.
  18. Siswandi. (2016). Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Politik Uang dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa Cemaga Selatan Kec Bunguran Selatan Kab Natuna tahun 2013, 1–25.
  19. Sumartini, L. (2004). Money Politics dalam Pemilu. Jakarta: Badan Kehakiman Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Syafií, M. (2019, April 16). Antisipasi ’Serangan Fajar‘, Desa di Jombang Pasang 15 CCTV. KOMPAS.com. Retrieved from https://regional.
  20. kompas.com/read/2019/04/16/19220341/ antisipasi-serangan-fajar-desa-di-jombang- pasang-15-cctv
  21. Umam, A. K. (2006). Kiai dan Budaya Korupsi di Indonesia. Semarang: Rasail.
  22. Umanailo, M. C. B. (2008). Max weber. Yogyakarta: Kencana.
  23. Wismabrata, M. H. (2019, April 16). 6 Fakta“ Serangan Fajar ”Sejumlah Oknum Caleg, Dimarahi Warga hingga Rampas Ponsel Petugas TPS. KOMPAS. com, pp. 4–8. Retrieved from https://regional. kompas.com/read/2019/04/16/14261971/6-fakta- serangan-fajar-sejumlah-oknum-caleg-dimarahi- warga-hingga-rampas?page=all